Just like Lightroom, Rawtherapee works with different sections. God knows why the “Queue” is positioned before the “Editor”, but in this article, I’ll focus on the “File Browser”, anyway. Rawtherapee consists of three main working areas: the “File Browser”, the “Queue”, and the “Editor”. That's Rawtherapee: Tidy and comprehensible. Besides the fact that it’s not a file manager, Rawtherapee might still be good enough for my purpose. After all, I want to be able to compare and inspect photographs before I edit them. Why do I still do it? Because I believe that a one-fits-all-solution is always better than separate programs. In this post, I will check how Rawtherapee can help you manage your files – even though it’s not meant to do that. It made me curious: Is this software a competitor for Lightroom, too? I took a few weeks to check the manual, make some test edits, and develop a workflow.Īs has been the case in the review of Darktable, there is a lot of criteria to look at when comparing software for photographers. A few times, the name “Rawtherapee” was mentioned in the comments. A lot of discussion has been going on in the comments, about whether it’s worth paying for an Adobe subscription or work with free and open software.
My recent series about the free and open software “Darktable” has caught some attention amongst the Fstoppers community. Rawtherapee Is Just a Development Software
0 kommentar(er)
